This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

The New England electric grid could require up to $1 billion in annual transmission investments through 2050 to support the clean energy transition, but even with that level of spending the grid operator said it will still face potential resource adequacy challenges.

ISO New England published its Regional Electricity Outlook on Monday, sketching out four requirements to support the transition: significant amounts of clean energy resources; sufficient balancing resources; a reliable fuel supply chain or energy reserve; and a robust transmission system.

“Over the next 20 years, we expect that renewable resources will displace natural gas as the main source of electricity generation in the region,” the ISO said.

Between now and 2040 the ISO expects its system to move from 6 GW of solar capacity to 28 GW, with most of that behind the meter. There are currently about 1.4 GW of wind resources on the system, but the grid operator expects that to grow by about 17 GW of offshore capacity.

Gas will fall from about 45% of New England’s electricity production in 2022 to about 12% in 2040, according to ISO projections, while renewables will rise from about 11% to 56% across the same period.

And while the New England grid has for decades seen the highest energy usage during the summer months, the expansion of electric heating and other new sources of demand means future grid use will peak in the winter.

“The future grid faces energy adequacy challenges on two fronts,” the ISO said. “Electrification of the transportation and heating sectors will drive demand higher and higher in the years ahead. Meanwhile, extreme weather caused by climate change will increasingly affect the productivity of energy resources.”

Heating electrification is expected to turn the regional grid back into a winter-peaking system sometime in the mid-2030s, the ISO said. “That could happen even sooner if the region experiences colder-than-average temperatures.”

“Energy adequacy concerns are already greatest around periods of prolonged cold, and that will remain true for the foreseeable future,” the ISO said.

Chart shows ISO New England shifting to a winter peaking system sometime after 2030.

Permission granted by ISO New England

Batteries will play a key role in New England’s future, though the grid operator identified challenges. There are currently about 90 MW of dispatchable short-duration battery storage on the grid but “that figure is expected to grow substantially.”

There are almost 40 GW of resources in the ISO’s interconnection queue, 46% of which are battery storage.

The ISO warned, however, that its research has found “strong seasonal patterns for battery charging cycles” and under some scenarios in a potential 2040 power system “the battery fleet may be depleted quickly and then struggle to recharge during the winter months.”

Daily average charge levels are higher in spring, when solar production rises and electricity demand is lower.

Access to liquefied natural gas for power generation, which is imported by ships, “can also be limited depending on shipping schedules and global economic forces.” The ISO launched a two-year Inventoried Energy Program ahead of the 2023-24 winter to incentivize fuel storage.

On the transmission front, developers are proposing upgrades to deliver over 14 GW of clean energy to New England. But the grid operator said that even with the new resources, by 2050, “more than half of the transmission system could face thermal overloads during times of peak demand.”

The ISO has proposed changes to its capacity market that it says would better reflect changing demand and available resources. The grid operator wants to shift from an annual auction that procures energy resource commitments three years in advance to a “prompt/seasonal” model it says would help ensure power system reliability and cost-efficiency.

The ISO recommended the new approach begin with the 2028-2029 capacity commitment period, which would be covered by Forward Capacity Auction 19. That auction was originally scheduled for 2025, but the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in January authorized a 1-year delay to allow for development of an improved capacity accreditation methodology. Shifting to the new procurement model could mean an additional 2-year delay.

Last month, the grid operator filed the results of its most recent auction with FERC, noting that it secured 31.56 GW of capacity and has sufficient resources for the 2027-2028 delivery period. The final results reflect a clearing price of $3.58 per kW-month across all zones and import interfaces, about a 38% increase over last year’s results.